Will Monaco suit Ferrari more than rivals? F1 Q&A
✨ AI Summary
🔊 جاري الاستماع
Will Monaco suit Ferrari more than rivals? F1 Q&AImage source, Getty ImagesImage caption, Lewis Hamilton has won three times at the Monaco Grand Prix - in 2008 with McLaren and 2016 and 2019 with MercedesPublished4 minutes agoCommentsThe European leg of the 2026 Formula 1 season begins with round six at the Monaco Grand Prix this weekend. Teenager Kimi Antonelli holds a 43-point advantage over Mercedes team-mate George Russell at the top of the drivers' championship following his fourth consecutive win of the campaign in Canada two weeks ago. Before the race in Monte Carlo, BBC Sport F1 correspondent Andrew Benson answers your latest questions.Why is the Monaco Grand Prix expected to suit Ferrari more than McLaren, Mercedes or Red Bull? - AndrewMercedes have dominated the 2026 season so far, winning all the grands prix from pole position. The only time they have beaten to either the front of the grid or a victory was in the sprint in Miami, when Lando Norris took pole and the win for McLaren.The reason Monaco has been identified as a place where that run may end, particularly in favour of Ferrari, is to do with car, engine and driver characteristics.Monaco is the least power-sensitive track on the calendar. In other words, it is the track where cornering performance - particularly at low and medium-speed - is most important, and engine power least.The Ferrari car this year has proved to be quick in the corners, arguably the fastest. That's good for Monaco.Meanwhile, its engine has both strengths and weaknesses. It has good low-speed pick-up, hence their good starts, but lacks top-end power. Again, good for Monaco, where a responsive engine is a benefit, and top-end power is relatively less important.As for the drivers, Charles Leclerc is an ace around Monaco. In the past six years, he has qualified on pole three times, been second on the grid twice and third once.Lewis Hamilton has also traditionally excelled at Monaco, and is in much better form this...





