Read the list: 44 lawmakers swept into Jack Smith text sweep as his legal reckoning grows
•Former special counsel Jack Smith’s team obtained and reviewed the contents of text messages exchanged between Trump White House officials and 44 current and former members of Congress, according to J...
•1, 2020, through Jan.
•The Justice Department said Smith’s investigative team "apparently bypassed" a filter team established to screen potentially privileged material before investigators accessed it.House Judiciary Commit...
هذا الخبر من Fox News. خبر يقدم أدوات ذكاء اصطناعي للتلخيص والترجمة والاستماع.
المصدر: Fox News | Source: Fox NewsFormer special counsel Jack Smith’s team obtained and reviewed the contents of text messages exchanged between Trump White House officials and 44 current and former members of Congress, according to Justice Department records released by two Republican-led Senate committees.
The messages were contained in White House records subpoenaed from the National Archives covering Oct. 1, 2020, through Jan. 20, 2021. The Justice Department said Smith’s investigative team "apparently bypassed" a filter team established to screen potentially privileged material before investigators accessed it.
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, on Wednesday issued a criminal referral for Smith, arguing that he misled Congress when he stated that he did not obtain or review lawmakers' text messages while carrying out his probes into President Donald Trump. The referral functions as an invitation for the Justice Department to launch an investigation into Smith's conduct.
JACK SMITH THRUST BACK INTO SPOTLIGHT AT BLANCHE HEARING OVER EXPOSED SENATORS’ MESSAGES
Read the list of 44 lawmakers:
Among the senators targeted in the probe were: Sens. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa; Ron Johnson, R-Wis.; John Cornyn, R-Texas; Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.; Josh Hawley, R-Mo.; Mike Lee, R-Utah; Cory Booker, D-N.J.; Cindy Hyde-Smith, R-Miss.; Dan Sullivan, R-Alaska; David Perdue, R-Ga.; Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn.; Martha McSally, R-Ariz.; Rand Paul, R-Ky.; Rick Scott, R-Fla.; Rob Portman, R-Ohio; Roy Blunt, R-Mo.; Susan Collins, R-Maine; Tim Scott, R-S.C.; Tom Cotton, R-Ark.; and Cory Gardner, R-Colo.
On the House side, the investigation targeted: Reps. Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif.; Steve Scalise, R-La.; Jim Jordan, R-Ohio; Devin Nunes, R-Calif.; Adam Smith, D-Wash.; Andy Biggs, R-Ariz.; Mark Walker, R-N.C.; Bryan Steil, R-Wis.; Dan Newhouse, R-Wash.; Doug Collins, R-Ga.; Dusty Johnson, R-S.D.; Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y.; John Katko, R-N.Y.; Josh Gottheimer, D-N.J.; Karen Bass, D-Calif.; Ken Buck, R-Colo.; Lee Zeldin, R-N.Y.; Mario Diaz-Balart, R-Fla.; Mo Brooks, R-Ala.; Morgan Griffith, R-Va.; Rodney Davis, R-Ill.; Russ Fulcher, R-Idaho; Scott Perry, R-Pa.; and Thomas Massie, R-Ky.
Fox News Digital reached out to every current lawmaker named on the list.
Grassley and Johnson, through their senior committee positions, were responsible for the release of the new documents.
Several lawmakers on the list had publicly documented roles in efforts surrounding the 2020 election, including those who have since condemned Smith’s review of their communications.
Sen. Chuck Grassley
As president pro tempore of the Senate, Grassley played a procedural role on Jan. 6, 2021, as Congress moved to certify the results of the 2020 presidential election. The senator, for instance, called the Senate into session before senators moved to the House's chamber to participate in a joint session where the results of each state would be certified.
Prior to Jan. 6, Grassley suggested that he may preside over the Senate’s debate surrounding disputes over the 2020 election if Vice President Mike Pence didn’t show up.
"Jack Smith’s criminal investigation of President Trump was a runaway train that had no brakes," Grassley said of his messages being collected. "Based on the information that’s been produced to me and Senator Johnson, Biden DOJ and FBI investigators apparently ignored their own routine investigative protocols to obtain and review work-related messages from me and dozens of my Republican and Democrat colleagues who were outside the scope of the government’s investigation."
Sen. Ron Johnson
In the lead-up to Jan. 6, Johnson joined a group of Republican senators calling for an emergency 10-day audit of disputed election results and saying they would vote against certifying electors from contested states unless such a review occurred.
Documents released by the House Jan. 6 committee in early 2023 reported that Johnson was communicating with former chairman of the Wisconsin Republican Party about a plan to have the state’s GOP-controlled legislature choose its presidential electors. The senator responded that he had no recollection of the conversation and accused the committee of trying to smear him.
Republicans were intensely critical of the House Jan. 6 committee, arguing that it lacked a meaningful voice for the opposition seeing as then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., selected every member while rejecting the nominations put forward by McCarthy. They also argued that the committee focused too little on security and intelligence failures ahead of the breach of the Capitol.
"This is yet another grotesque example of the Biden administration’s weaponization of the Justice Department," Johnson said of the seized text messages. "Jack Smith’s team acted with impunity as they disregarded their own protocols to obtain and access White House text messages, including messages to and from 44 Members of Congress. This is precisely why Chairman Grassley and I have worked to uncover the truth, bring transparency to the American people, and hold accountable those who weaponized federal law enforcement."
BIDEN SPECIAL COUNSEL’S 'RUNAWAY TRAIN’ SCOOPED UP SENSITIVE LAWMAKER INFO: 'ABUSE OF POWER'
Sen. Lindsey Graham
In the days after the 2020 election, Graham urged Trump not to concede. He later donated to Trump’s legal defense fund and, as chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, opened inquiries into election procedures in several battleground states and contacted state election officials.
The late South Carolina senator grew frustrated with Trump and his followers as their objections continued to fail in court and fully broke with the movement following the riot on Jan. 6.
"Count me out," he said at the time. "Enough is enough."
Sen. Josh Hawley
Hawley is notable in that he, on Dec. 30, 2020, became the first senator to announce his intention to formally object to Electoral College votes during the certification process. His decision was consequential as federal law required objections from both a representative and a senator to force a debate on the election.
WATCH: HAWLEY FUMES AFTER 4 GOP SENATORS HELP SINK TRUMP-BACKED VOTER ID LAW
Trump attempted to call Hawley six times ahead of the Jan. 6 breach, according to White House call logs obtained by the House Jan. 6 select committee, showing that there was a line of communication between the two.
Though some senators abandoned their objections to the 2020 election after the Capitol was breached, Hawley maintained his objections and voted against certifying the results from Arizona and Pennsylvania.
Hawley called the documents released by Grassley and Johnson "more evidence of Biden corruption" adding that, "Jack Smith illegally scooped up the text messages of Senators — including mine."
Sen. Mike Lee
Text messages turned over by former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows to the House Jan. 6 committee show that Lee discussed possible legal and constitutional avenues for challenging the 2020 election results.
Lee initially told Meadows that he supported exhausting every available legal and constitutional remedy to address concerns about the election. By Jan. 3, 2021, however, he warned that the effort "could all backfire badly," according to text messages Meadows turned over to the House Jan. 6 committee.
The senator ultimately voted against sustaining objections to Arizona’s and Pennsylvania's election results.
Mike Lee slammed Smith's collection of text messages this month as "un-American" and argued that it came "uncomfortably close to spying on a coequal, coordinate branch."
Rep. Steve Scalise
Scalise, as House Republican whip, was responsible for convincing representatives to vote in line with the party’s interests, providing a straightforward reason as to why White House staff may have been in contact with him.
Further, a publicly released deposition shows that a Scalise aide communicated with Pence’s legislative-affairs director regarding a Jan. 3 call organized by Jordan involving Trump, Meadows and members pressing certification objections.
The Louisiana congressman called congressional action the "only remaining recourse" for addressing what he described as improper changes to election laws in several states.
While he condemned rioting, Scalise, like Hawley, ultimately voted to reject Biden’s electoral votes from both Arizona and Pennsylvania.
Rep. Jim Jordan
Jordan participated in efforts to challenge the 2020 election results, including discussions about delaying congressional certification and objecting to electoral votes.
On Jan. 2, the Ohio congressman led a conference call with Trump and other members of Congress to discuss strategies for delaying the Jan. 6 joint session, according to the House Jan. 6 committee’s final report.
Jordan also reportedly had a 10-minute-long call with Trump on the morning of Jan. 6, according to publicly released phone records. After the breach of the Capitol, Jordan condemned the violence but voted to sustain objections to the electoral results in Arizona and Pennsylvania.
"You can’t do that. As Senator Hawley just said, this is a separation of powers issue," Jordan told Fox News host Sean Hannity earlier this month. "There’s a speech or debate clause. It was supposed to be filtered and screened. It wasn’t. It was just given from the National Archives to Jack Smith’s team."
Smith’s attorneys called the criminal referral "meritless" Thursday in a letter previously obtained by Fox News Digital.
"The House Judiciary Committee’s referral to the Department of Justice of our client Jack Smith is based on a spurious claim that Mr. Smith provided false testimony during his eight-hour deposition on December 17, 2025. The referral is made not because Mr. Smith made a false statement—the letter concedes he did not—but because he did not proactively disclose information that was not responsive to a question asked," the lawyer wrote.
"During his testimony, Mr. Smith provided truthful, responsive answers and candidly discussed his work as Special Counsel. This referral reflects a chilling eagerness to weaponize the justice system by attacking a career, nonpartisan public servant who faithfully and fearlessly performed his duties by following the facts and the law."
Fox News Digital's Elizabeth Elkind contributed to this report.
ملاحظة تحريرية | Editorial Note: نُشر هذا المقال في الأصل بواسطة Fox News. خبر (Khabr) هي منصة إعلامية أردنية مرخّصة تعمل بالذكاء الاصطناعي. نضيف قيمة تحريرية من خلال: تحليل ذكي للأخبار، ملخصات تلقائية، رواية صوتية بالذكاء الاصطناعي، ترجمة متعددة اللغات، وتدقيق الحقائق. هدفنا جعل الأخبار أكثر وضوحاً وسهولةً للقارئ العربي.
This article was originally published by Fox News. Khabr is a licensed Jordanian AI-powered news platform (Registration #82086). We add editorial value through: AI-powered news analysis, automated summaries, AI audio narration, multi-language translation (Arabic, English, French, Turkish), and AI fact-checking. Our mission is to make news more accessible and understandable for Arabic-speaking audiences worldwide.

