Ex-Syrian intelligence chief found guilty of torture and sexual abuse by Austrian court

Ex-Syrian intelligence chief found guilty of torture and sexual abuse by Austrian courtImage source, AFP via Getty ImagesImage caption, Khaled al-H. (C) was head of Syria's ​General Intelligence Directorate in Raqqa from 2011 until 2013.ByBethany BellBBC Vienna CorrespondentPublished13 minutes agoA former Syrian intelligence chief in the ​city of Raqqa has been found guilty of torture and sexual abuse of opponents of the former Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad, at a court in Vienna, Austria.A second Syrian official, the former police chief in Raqqa, was also found guilty of abusing political opponents.The case in Vienna was a relatively rare example of a European country claiming jurisdiction for crimes committed by agents of Assad's government.The former intelligence chief, named only as Khaled al-H. under Austrian privacy rules, was head of Syria's ​General Intelligence Directorate in Raqqa from 2011, when the uprising against Assad began, until 2013 when the Free ⁠Syrian Army took over the city. He then fled Raqqa.Khaled al-H., a member of the Druze ethno-religious minority, was found guilty of committing torture.Both he and the second man, named as Moussab Abou R., were found guilty of sexual coercion, aggravated coercion and inflicting serious bodily harm.They have each been sentenced to eight years in prison.Prosecutors said that on many occasions the men ordered or failed to oppose the abuse of anti-government protestors in the city of Raqqa.Both men denied the charges. Earlier in the trial Khaled al-H. said he had not ordered or witnessed any torture at his place of work.He also said that as a member of a minority group, the Druze, he had been obliged to follow orders.Prosecutors said the torture was carried out to "suppress the protest movement against the regime at the time and to intimidate the population".Some of their victims, former detainees in Raqqa, travelled from around Europe and Syria to testify at the trial. The court heard...