China’s new ethnic unity law extends its legal reach overseas

play Live Sign upShow navigation menu.css-15ru6p1{font-size:inherit;font-weight:normal;}Navigation menuNewsShow more news sectionsAfricaAsiaUS & CanadaLatin AmericaEuropeAsia PacificWorld CupMiddle EastExplainedOpinionVideoMoreShow more sectionsFeaturesEconomySportHuman RightsClimate CrisisInvestigationsInteractivesIn PicturesScience & TechnologyPodcastsTravelSponsored Contentplay Live Click here to searchsearchSign upNavigation menucaret-leftTrendingUS-Israel war on IranWorld Cup 2026Tracking Israel's ceasefire violationsDonald Trumpcaret-rightNews|GovernmentChina’s new ethnic unity law extends its legal reach overseasRather than promote ethnic harmony, activists say Law on the Promotion of Ethnic Unity and Progress could justify transnational repression. xwhatsapp-strokecopylinkgoogleAdd Al Jazeera on GoogleinfoDelegates in ethnic minority costumes hold documents as they leave following the closing session of the National People's Congress (NPC) at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, China, on March 12, 2026 [Tingshu Wang/Reuters]By Erin HalePublished On 2 Jul 20262 Jul 2026China says it has the right to pursue legal action against overseas individuals and organisations that undermine its ethnic unity as Beijing moves to expand its extraterritorial reach. Passed in March by the National People’s Congress, the “Law on the Promotion of Ethnic Unity and Progress” officially went into effect on Wednesday. The legislation has already come under fire from rights watchdogs like the United Nations Special Rapporteurs on Minority Rights and Cultural Rights, who say the law has been used to justify forced assimilation in regions like Tibet and Xinjiang, rather than encourage ethnic harmony. Article 63 of the law has drawn further international attention for extending China’s legal reach overseas. It states that “organisations and individuals outside of mainland China who commit crimes aimed at [China] that undermine ethnic unity and progress or create ethnic division are to be pursued for legal responsibility in accordance with law”, according to a translation. Amnesty International said that Article 63 could be used to justify transnational repression of overseas citizens and activists, who are monitored by an alleged network of unofficial Chinese “police stations” as well as student or cultural groups. “Peaceful advocacy for minority rights in China by anyone, anywhere could be characterised as undermining ‘ethnic unity’,” Amnesty’s Deputy Regional Director Sarah Brooks said this week. Brooks said “unity” in this case did not mean “harmony between different communities” but conformity with Beijing’s political line. Zhou Jianshe, the deputy director-general and spokesperson of the State Council Information Office Press Bureau – the government agency responsible for introducing China’s national policies to the world – responded to the controversy last week. Zhou said Article 63 was a “legitimate, lawful, necessary, and workable legal provision” and Western media had tried to distort and smear the law as an example of “long-arm jurisdiction”. Beyond international rights groups, the law has also raised the alarm in Taiwan as a possible tool to prosecute or harass its citizens abroad. In a speech on Wednesday, Taiwanese President William Lai Ching-te urged citizens to remain cautious while travelling or living in China after the law went into effect. Lai also said Taipei would continue to monitor the situation and provide guidance for officials stationed overseas. Taiwan, a self-ruled democracy claimed by Beijing, shares deep cultural and historical ties with China despite a surge in Taiwanese nationalism over the past 20 years. Beijing considers Taiwan’s government to be “separatists” and cut off official contact in 2016 following the election of President Tsai Ing-wen. Taipei stepped up its travel warnings in 2024 after China ruled that “die-hard” Taiwanese independence activists could be tried in absentia and face the death penalty if found guilty of promoting secession from China. Advertisement AboutAboutShow moreAbout UsCode of EthicsTerms and ConditionsEU/EEA Regulatory NoticePrivacy PolicyCookie PolicyCookie PreferencesAccessibility StatementSitemapWork for usConnectConnectShow moreContact UsUser Accounts HelpAdvertise with usStay ConnectedNewslettersChannel FinderTV SchedulePodcastsSubmit a TipPaid Partner ContentOur ChannelsOur ChannelsShow moreAl Jazeera ArabicAl Jazeera EnglishAl Jazeera Investigative UnitAl Jazeera MubasherAl Jazeera DocumentaryAl Jazeera BalkansAJ+Our NetworkOur NetworkShow moreAl Jazeera Centre for StudiesAl Jazeera Media InstituteLearn ArabicAl Jazeera Centre for Public Liberties & Human RightsAl Jazeera ForumAl Jazeera Hotel PartnersFollow Al Jazeera English: