British court dismisses Bahrain’s bid to block activists’ spyware lawsuit

play Live Sign upShow navigation menuNavigation menuNewsShow more news sectionsAfricaAsiaUS & CanadaLatin AmericaEuropeAsia PacificMiddle EastExplainedSportOpinionVideoMoreShow more sectionsFeaturesEconomyHuman RightsClimate CrisisInvestigationsInteractivesIn PicturesScience & TechnologyPodcastsTravelSponsored Contentplay Live Click here to searchsearchSign upNews|CourtsBritish court dismisses Bahrain’s bid to block activists’ spyware lawsuitRuling establishes that countries using spyware on people in the UK can be sued. xwhatsapp-strokecopylinkgoogleAdd Al Jazeera on GoogleinfoThe Royal Courts of Justice in London [File: Jeff Spicer/Getty Images]By Al Jazeera Staff and News AgenciesPublished On 27 Jul 202627 Jul 2026Britain’s Supreme Court has dismissed a bid by Bahrain to claim state immunity to close down a spyware lawsuit filed by two dissidents. The ruling, handed down on Monday by a narrow 3-2 majority, sets a significant precedent, confirming that foreign states can be sued in UK courts over the remote surveillance of individuals in Britain, even when the hacking itself was directed from abroad. Saeed Shehabi, a journalist and founder of a Bahraini political party that opposes the Khalifa royal family’s rule, and Moosa Mohammed, a Bahraini refugee, accused the Bahraini government of infecting their computers in 2011 with spyware known as FinSpy, capable of logging keystrokes, tracking locations and monitoring their activities remotely. Both men, who live in the UK, sued in London’s High Court in 2020, seeking damages for “psychiatric harm”. Bahrain denied the hacking and argued the alleged acts took place outside UK jurisdiction, entitling it to immunity. The High Court of Justice in London rejected that argument in 2023 in a decision upheld by the Court of Appeal the following year, prompting Bahrain’s final appeal to the Supreme Court. In Monday’s ruling, the court found that the alleged surveillance counted as an act carried out in the UK, claiming the claimants and their computers were located in Britain when the spyware allegedly took effect, opening the way for the case to proceed to trial. The judgement is part of a growing body of litigation testing whether states and surveillance firms can be held liable in Western courts for spyware deployed against critics abroad after similar cases, including WhatsApp’s ongoing lawsuit in the United States against the NSO Group over Pegasus spyware. Rights groups have long accused Bahrain of surveilling dissidents and journalists. Advertisement AboutAboutShow moreAbout UsCode of EthicsTerms and ConditionsEU/EEA Regulatory NoticePrivacy PolicyCookie PolicyCookie PreferencesAccessibility StatementSitemapWork for usConnectConnectShow moreContact UsUser Accounts HelpAdvertise with usStay ConnectedNewslettersChannel FinderTV SchedulePodcastsSubmit a TipPaid Partner ContentOur ChannelsOur ChannelsShow moreAl Jazeera ArabicAl Jazeera EnglishAl Jazeera Investigative UnitAl Jazeera MubasherAl Jazeera DocumentaryAl Jazeera BalkansAJ+Our NetworkOur NetworkShow moreAl Jazeera Centre for StudiesAl Jazeera Media InstituteLearn ArabicAl Jazeera Centre for Public Liberties & Human RightsAl Jazeera ForumAl Jazeera Hotel PartnersFollow Al Jazeera English: