Bake Off's Paul Hollywood reheats his war with neighbours over plans to build a walled kitchen at his £1million 18th-century farmhouse

Published: 19:04, 7 June 2026 | Updated: 19:04, 7 June 2026 Paul Hollywood has reignited a planning battle at his £1million Kent farmhouse – just months after council officials rejected the star's bid to build a camera-friendly kitchen for cookery shows. The Great British Bake Off judge has unveiled freshly-baked plans for his 18th-century countryside retreat after falling foul of town hall planners last October. Hollywood, 60, bought the four-bed farmhouse near Ashford for £810,000 in 2019 and had intentions to replace a 1980s lean-to conservatory with a grand open-plan kitchen-diner. Planning papers said the new kitchen would help the celebrity baker film at home, adding that TV cookery shows would be a 'social benefit to the public'. But the claim raised eyebrows locally, with the parish council asking what commercial use was being proposed – and what benefit it would bring to the area. Ashford Borough Council ruled the scheme was not a 'sympathetic or appropriate addition' to the Grade II listed building and warned its 'scale, bulk, design and massing' would harm the property’s character. Now Hollywood and his wife Melissa Spalding, 42, have submitted a revised scheme, and the filming references appear to have vanished. The new plans again seek to demolish the existing conservatory – but this time replace it with a smaller side extension for a new kitchen and dining area. Paul Hollywood has reignited a planning battle at his £1million Kent farmhouse (pictured with wife Melissa Spalding) The new plans again seek to demolish the existing conservatory – but this time replace it with a smaller side extension for a new kitchen and dining area Hollywood bought the four-bed farmhouse near Ashford for £810,000 in 2019 and had intentions to replace a 1980s lean-to conservatory with a grand open-plan kitchen-diner Two rival options have been put forward, with illustrations of both included in planning papers. One scheme would see a new outbuilding-style extension linked to the farmhouse by a small lead-roofed glazed link, increasing the building’s footprint by 15 per cent. That is significantly smaller than the rejected 2025 scheme, which would have increased the footprint by almost a quarter. A second option, named 'Scheme B', takes a more contemporary approach, with a new kitchen-dining space joined to the farmhouse by a sloping 'catslide' roof. Its footprint would increase the farmhouse’s footprint by a modest 13 per cent. The planning statement says both schemes have been designed to appear 'subservient' to the original listed building and to better reflect the farmhouse’s character. Under both plans, Hollywood’s current kitchen would be stripped out and converted into a study. The new application also reveals that Hollywood's walled kitchen garden dream has also been scaled back. The previous plans were expected to include fruit trees, raised beds and pathways so the celebrity baker could grow his own vegetables and herbs. But council officers said the proposed high-level brick wall looked more suited to a 'higher status country house'. This time, the garden would be enclosed by a lower brick wall using materials intended to match the existing property. Architects acting for Hollywood argue the revised designs directly address the council’s previous concerns. Planning documents insist the proposals would 'bring clear benefits' to the heritage of the farmhouse and would not harm its character. They state: 'The design approach has been changed so that both options are sympathetic to the characteristics of the original listed building in terms of symmetry, appearance and setting. 'It is considered that both options offer a high-quality design approach whereby both options utilise elements of form, articulation and materiality from the host dwelling to ensure that the extensions would not detract from the significance of the building, its setting or wider area.' The papers add that the revised designs are 'materially smaller' than the refused scheme and should now be granted planning permission. The earlier battle saw one local defend Hollywood, saying: 'Why shouldn’t he be allowed to film in his own home? It’s his own private property.' This time, the first public comments appear supportive. One option would see a new outbuilding-style extension linked to the farmhouse by a small lead-roofed glazed link, increasing the building’s footprint by 15 per cent A second options, named 'Scheme B', takes a more contemporary approach, with a new kitchen-dining space joined to the farmhouse by a sloping 'catslide' roof Architects acting for Hollywood argue the revised designs directly address the council’s previous concerns One neighbour wrote: 'These works are of no concern to us. The property is well screened off and should be of no concern to anyone else either. I support this application.' Another said: 'I support this application, it complements the existing property and the surrounding area.' There are currently no objections listed on Ashford Borough Council’s planning portal. No comments have so far been submitted. Why not be the first to send us your thoughts, or debate this issue live on our message boards. By posting your comment you agree to our house rules. Do you want to automatically post your MailOnline comments to your Facebook Timeline? Your comment will be posted to MailOnline as usual. Do you want to automatically post your MailOnline comments to your Facebook Timeline? Your comment will be posted to MailOnline as usual We will automatically post your comment and a link to the news story to your Facebook timeline at the same time it is posted on MailOnline. To do this we will link your MailOnline account with your Facebook account. We’ll ask you to confirm this for your first post to Facebook. You can choose on each post whether you would like it to be posted to Facebook. Your details from Facebook will be used to provide you with tailored content, marketing and ads in line with our Privacy Policy.