Whose credit is it anyway? Delhi High Court asks coaching centre to remove ‘defamatory’ posts on CLAT 2026 topper

Weather ePaper Today’s Paper Journalism of Courage Home ePaper Politics Explained Opinion India Business Premium Cities UPSC Entertainment Sports World Lifestyle Tech Subscribe Sign In TrendingUPSC OfferIPL 2026US NewsPuzzles & GamesLegal NewsFresh TakeHealthResearch🎙️ Podcast Advertisement function checkAndLoadWindowSizeScript() { if (window.jQuery) { // jQuery is loaded, include your script jQuery(document).ready(function($) { // Your existing script for checking window width if (window.innerWidth) var page_w = window.innerWidth; else if (document.all) var page_w = document.body.clientWidth; if (page_w > 1024) { $(".add-left, .add-right").show(); } else { $(".add-left, .add-right").hide(); } }); } else { // jQuery is not loaded, check again after 0.2 seconds setTimeout(checkAndLoadWindowSizeScript, 200); } } // Initial call to the function checkAndLoadWindowSizeScript(); NewsLegalWhose credit is it anyway? Delhi High Court asks coaching centre to remove ‘defamatory’ posts on CLAT 2026 topper Whose credit is it anyway? Delhi High Court asks coaching centre to remove ‘defamatory’ posts on CLAT 2026 topper The dispute arises from a suit by a coaching centre, Toprankers Edtech Solutions, alleging that a rival institute falsely claimed that its student, who secured AIR 1 in CLAT 2026, had trained under the rival group. Written by: Vineet Upadhyay6 min readNew DelhiApr 17, 2026 03:41 PM IST The plaintiffs claimed that after the results were declared, the rival institute attempted to portray the topper as its own student. (Image generated using AI) Make us preferred source on Google Whatsapp twitter Facebook Reddit PRINT Delhi High Court news: The Delhi High Court has restrained a coaching institute from using a CLAT 2026 topper’s identity and ordered the removal of allegedly defamatory online content within 72 hours, amid a dispute over who can claim credit for her success. Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, in an order dated April 13, 2026, found that the material placed on record showed a prima facie attempt to harm the reputation of the plaintiffs through videos, posts and advertisements. “It appears that the defendants have indeed, prima facie, carried out a defamatory campaign which appears to be disparaging and is clearly avoidable. The reference by the defendant nos.1 and 2 (LPT Edtech Private Limited and its director Sagar Joshi) to the plaintiff nos. 1 and 2 (Toprankers Edtech Solutions Private Limited and WKD Learnings LLP) and use of the trademark “LegalEdge” in their blog, posts, video reels, that too, without permission, is a clear unauthorised, unpermitted use of such trademarks, which will constitute infringement,” the Delhi High Court said on April 13. Clarifying that its observations are not at all based on “personality rights” of the topper, the court added, “The statements appear to be made wilfully to bring disrepute to the goodwill, reputation and standing of the plaintiff nos.1 and 2 and would constitute disparagement. It would be appropriate, therefore, to pass necessary orders protecting the rights of the plaintiffs.” To prevent further damage, the Delhi High Court passed a series of interim directions: Vineet Upadhyay is an Assistant Editor with The Indian Express, where he leads specialized coverage of the Indian judicial system. Expertise Specialized Legal Authority: Vineet has spent the better part of his career analyzing the intricacies of the law. His expertise lies in "demystifying" judgments from the Supreme Court of India, various High Courts, and District Courts. His reporting covers a vast spectrum of legal issues, including: Constitutional & Civil Rights: Reporting on landmark rulings regarding privacy, equality, and state accountability. Criminal Justice & Enforcement: Detailed coverage of high-profile cases involving the Enforcement Directorate (ED), NIA, and POCSO matters. Consumer Rights & Environmental Law: Authoritative pieces on medical negligence compensation, environmental protection (such as the "living person" status of rivers), and labor rights. Over a Decade of Professional Experience: Prior to joining The Indian Express, he served as a Principal Correspondent/Legal Reporter for The Times of India and held significant roles at The New Indian Express. His tenure has seen him report from critical legal hubs, including Delhi and Uttarakhand. ... Read More