Trump doubles down on claim he 'doesn't think about' Americans' finances after Fox host's challenge: 'It's gonna be short-term pain'

By STEPHEN M. LEPORE, US SENIOR REPORTER Published: 04:00, 16 May 2026 | Updated: 04:00, 16 May 2026 Donald Trump has doubled down on his claim that he 'doesn't think about' Americans' financial situation but promised that there will only be 'short-term pain' on inflation. Trump created a firestorm when he said financial struggles are not a factor in his decision-making as he seeks to negotiate an end to the Iran war, saying that preventing Tehran from acquiring a nuclear weapon is his top priority.  'I don't think about anybody. I think about one thing — we cannot let Iran have a nuclear weapon. That's all,' he said when asked Tuesday if he thought about citizens' economic pain. Trump was grilled about the comments in an interview with Bret Baier broadcast by Fox News on Friday. The Special Report host asked Trump what his message was to leftwing critics who had 'jumped all over' his remarks. 'That's a perfect statement, I'd make it again,' he said. When Bret Baier pointed out that in the media environment, that's the only part of the statement that will get played, Trump cut him off. 'No,' Trump repeated several times. He then clarified what he said he believes Americans will face in the coming months as the US looks to finish the Iran excursion. Donald Trump doubled down on his claim that he 'doesn't think about' Americans' financial situation but promised that there will only be 'short-term pain' on inflation Trump created a firestorm when he said financial struggles are not a factor in his decision-making as he seeks to negotiate an end to the Iran war, saying that preventing Tehran from acquiring a nuclear weapon is his top priority 'It's very simple. When people hear me say it, everybody agrees, short-term pain. It's gonna be short-term pain. But the pain is much less than people thought… And that question was a fake question, and they didn't put my full answer. I totally care,' he said. Trump's remarks drew scrutiny from critics ​who argue the administration should balance geopolitical objectives with the economic impact on Americans, particularly as cost-of-living ​concerns remain a top issue for voters ahead of the November midterm elections. Asked to elaborate on the president's comments, White House Communications Director Steven Cheung said that Trump's 'ultimate responsibility is the safety and security of Americans. Iran cannot have a ​nuclear weapon, and if action wasn't taken, they'd have one, which threatens all Americans.' Trump is under growing ​pressure from fellow Republicans who fear economic pain caused by the war could cost ⁠their party control of the House of Representatives and possibly the Senate in November. Rising energy costs linked to the Iran conflict have pushed up gasoline prices and contributed to inflation. US consumer inflation in April posted its largest gain in three years, according to data released on Tuesday. Trump framed his approach as a matter of ​national and global security, ​suggesting economic concerns were ⁠secondary to preventing nuclear proliferation. US intelligence assessments, however, indicate that the time Iran would need to build a nuclear weapon has not changed since last summer, when ​analysts estimated that a US-Israeli attack had increased the timeline to nine ​months to a ⁠year, according to three sources familiar with the matter.  President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping tour Zhongnanhai Garden Smoke and flames rise at the site of airstrikes on an oil depot in Tehran The assessments of Tehran's nuclear program remain broadly unchanged even after two months of a war. Trump's allies have echoed his argument that the risks posed by a ⁠nuclear-armed Iran ​outweigh short-term economic hardships.  Iran denies seeking nuclear weapons and says ​its program is for peaceful purposes, though Western powers suspect it aims to develop the capability to build a bomb. Trump himself told Fox Friday that the Iran War, not the economy or redistricting, will determine the result of the midterms.  'I think a bigger difference would be if I win quickly [in Iran], as opposed to after [the elections], but again, I'm not going to let the election determine what's going to happen with respect to Iran, because they cannot have a nuclear weapon,' he said.  However, he did admit that getting gas prices down would help.   “A bigger difference would be if that price went down. Look, prices are down, but the energy caused it to go up, and I said to my people, ''I hate to do this to you, but I’m going to screw up your numbers for a little while, because we have to stop the nuclear weapon stuff with Iran.'' No comments have so far been submitted. Why not be the first to send us your thoughts, or debate this issue live on our message boards. By posting your comment you agree to our house rules. Do you want to automatically post your MailOnline comments to your Facebook Timeline? Your comment will be posted to MailOnline as usual. Do you want to automatically post your MailOnline comments to your Facebook Timeline? Your comment will be posted to MailOnline as usual We will automatically post your comment and a link to the news story to your Facebook timeline at the same time it is posted on MailOnline. To do this we will link your MailOnline account with your Facebook account. We’ll ask you to confirm this for your first post to Facebook. You can choose on each post whether you would like it to be posted to Facebook. Your details from Facebook will be used to provide you with tailored content, marketing and ads in line with our Privacy Policy.