‘Normal wear and tear in marriage not cruelty’: Jharkhand High Court refuses to grant divorce to man

Weather ePaper Today’s Paper Journalism of Courage Home ePaper Politics Explained Opinion India Business Premium Cities UPSC Entertainment Sports World Lifestyle Tech Subscribe Sign In TrendingUPSC OfferIPL 2026US NewsPuzzles & GamesLegal NewsFresh TakeHealthResearch🎙️ Podcast Advertisement function checkAndLoadWindowSizeScript() { if (window.jQuery) { // jQuery is loaded, include your script jQuery(document).ready(function($) { // Your existing script for checking window width if (window.innerWidth) var page_w = window.innerWidth; else if (document.all) var page_w = document.body.clientWidth; if (page_w > 1024) { $(".add-left, .add-right").show(); } else { $(".add-left, .add-right").hide(); } }); } else { // jQuery is not loaded, check again after 0.2 seconds setTimeout(checkAndLoadWindowSizeScript, 200); } } // Initial call to the function checkAndLoadWindowSizeScript(); NewsLegal‘Normal wear and tear in marriage not cruelty’: Jharkhand High Court refuses to grant divorce to man ‘Normal wear and tear in marriage not cruelty’: Jharkhand High Court refuses to grant divorce to man The Jharkhand High Court was hearing the appeal of the man challenging the family court’s May 2023 order, which had granted restitution of conjugal rights to the wife. Written by: Richa Sahay7 min readNew DelhiApr 16, 2026 08:00 AM IST The Jharkhand High Court said that the cruelty must be more serious than the ordinary wear and tear of married life. (AI-generated image) Make us preferred source on Google Whatsapp twitter Facebook Reddit PRINT In a case that highlights the realities of modern marriages, the Jharkhand High Court recently refused to grant a divorce to a husband from his disabled wife, holding that living in different states for work or having compatibility issues does not amount to “cruelty” under the law. Justices Sujit Narayan Prasad and Sanjay Prasad, dismissing the husband’s appeal and upholding the family court’s order directing restitution of conjugal rights, emphasised that not every disagreement or difficulty in a marriage is “cruelty.” The bench noted that the wife is a government employee in Jharkhand, while the husband has a central government job in Odisha, which is transferable and could enable him to relocate. “Simple trivialities which can truly be described as a reasonable wear and tear of married life cannot amount to cruelty. In many marriages, each party can, if it so wishes, discover many causes for complaint, but such grievances arise mostly from temperamental disharmony. Such disharmony or incompatibility is not cruelty and will not furnish a cause for the dissolution of marriage,” the April 10 order read.  The bench was hearing the appeal filed by the husband challenging the family court’s May 2023 order, which had granted restitution of conjugal rights to the wife. Husband’s job in Odhisa, wife’s in Jharkhand Richa Sahay is a Legal Correspondent for The Indian Express, where she focuses on simplifying the complexities of the Indian judicial system. A law postgraduate, she leverages her advanced legal education to bridge the gap between technical court rulings and public understanding, ensuring that readers stay informed about the rapidly evolving legal landscape. Expertise Advanced Legal Education: As a law postgraduate, Richa possesses the academic depth required to interpret intricate statutes and constitutional nuances. Her background allows her to provide more than just summaries; she offers context-driven analysis of how legal changes impact the average citizen. Specialized Beat: She operates at the intersection of law and public policy, focusing on: Judicial Updates: Providing timely reports on orders from the Supreme Court of India and various High Courts. Legal Simplification: Translating dense "legalese" into accessible, engaging narratives without sacrificing factual accuracy. Legislative Changes: Monitoring new bills, amendments, and regulatory shifts that shape Indian society. ... Read More